STRUCK BY LIGHTENING

From John Blyth (Area 20)

Having read the article by Bob Lewis in the October Newsletter (page 4) I was interested as 1 had exactly the same trouble on one film out of eleven which .1 had processed following my return from a holiday in Italy. I have, oddly enough come to a quite different conclusion from Bob as the circumstances are totally different. 

I was using the same film from a bulk 30m reel, home loaded in a Weston Loader, and there was no sign of this trouble except on the ONE films. It showed throughout the film and on about every frame except One or two; sometimes just a blotch of yellow, sometimes jagged streaks. It was the new Barfen film, which with some processing time adjustments, I now find pretty good. I have had a (pre-loaded) old Barfen film Once, which produced some whitish blotches in the exposed frames, and thought straight away back to this but what I had this time was not the same; anyhow, with a bulk length, it would be a bit odd to have all the faults neatly positioned in one 36exp. length. So What was out? 

Loading in the Watson Loader? Well, I did not discount this, but I’ve used the thing for some years now without any troubles of THIS kind, although I’ve had other difficulties from time to time - I could not recall that any of this lot were difficult to load, or that I’d done anything silly. 

Loading the film into the tank? Well, I thought, can we here be getting to it? I have a darkroom of a kind, but it is really a kind dark gray room, just dark enough to do B&W printing in, but certainly not for handling colour film, except possibly very late at night, so I don’t use it, to put films into tanks.~ Instead I use a Phago changing bag which I’ve had for years and has never given any trouble. Could it be wearing out? But the other films before and after this one were OK. 

Then I came to the only thing which I can get to - as I use a Ling bulk kit, and don’t (a) even buy, much-less use, the chemical reversal, (b) don’t do the D2 stage with the top off the tank, as I normally agitate by inversion - was that light was getting. into the bag somehow, and this, I thought could only be through the zip. 

This is quite substantial zip, with a flap over it which you can fix over with a couple of press studs. “ I’m sometimes careless about fixing this down, and have never had any trouble as a result, but I did recall that it was bright in the kitchen that morning, with the sun shining in, and not far from where I was working too, so I came to the conclusion that under such conditions, it WAS possible for light to get through the closed zip. 

I do’ not discount what Bob has said in his piece, and he may well be right in his case, but I think you will see that under the circumstances it couldn’t have happened to me the same way. 

Bob Lewis gives these comments on John’s article. 

As John has said in his article, his processing fault was not caused by the same processing fault I experienced, but the nature of the two faults are similar. 

My processing fault was due to opening the tank lid too early before the chemical reversal bath had time to, ‘kill’ the 1st developer, but John says he did not use a chemical reversal bath. I assume he was using white light reversal. 

Could not the blotches of yellow and jagged streaks john experienced, on one of his films be caused by switching on the white light when the 1st developer was still slightly active? 

Perhaps the stop bath had lost its action, or perhaps, if a stop bath was not used, the washing procedure prior to opening the lid had not been enough. 

Thus in both cases, mine and john’s the markings on the film could be caused by extraneous light falling on the’ film when the 1st developer was still somewhat active, and we both had a similar fault, but from different procedures.

Agfa Darkroom Editorial CRCMain

This page brought to you by:
VintageHammond.Com - We Buy-Sell-Trade Vintage Hammond Organs

TheatreOrgans.com operates KEZL-FM Culbertson, NE A Non Profit Full Powered Radio Station